VN:F [1.5.8_856]
The internet and talk radio are in danger of increased government regulation, a national pollster and former radio host said yesterday at a forum held by the conservative Heritage Foundation.
Bestselling author Brad O’Leary said Americans should be wary of radio and internet regulations because they tend to disadvantage the conservative media.
“Bills being introduced into Congress will bring a fairness doctrine to the internet,” he said.
Repealed during the Reagan Administration, the fairness doctrine was a Federal Communications Commission policy that required broadcasters to present both sides of every issue.
O’Leary said that talk radio and the internet are the only way for conservatives to express themselves. Conservatives, O’Leary believes, would be unfairly disadvantaged by the re-implementation of the fairness doctrine.
“Newspapers and the news country are completely biased,” O’Leary said. “Obama could count on wonderful press and glowing stories during the election. He could not count on that with talk radio or the internet.”
But some Democrats in Congress want to re-regulate the airwaves.
“I think it’s absolutely time to pass a standard, whether its called the fairness doctrine or something else, but it’s time to be bringing accountability to the airwaves,” Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said in an February interview. “I have already had some discussions with colleagues.”
Other legislation being considered could force talk radio to feature more local coverage and diversify their ownership.
President Obama has said he does not support a renewal of the fairness doctrine, but he does support other measures to increase the number of viewpoints on the air.
“Obama supports media-ownership caps, network neutrality, public broadcasting, as well as increasing minority ownership of broadcasting and print outlets,” said Obama’s former campaign press secretary Michael Ortiz.
O’Leary said new regulation would violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment. He also said the FCC might not renew the licenses of broadcasts that were considered not diverse enough.
“They believe talk radio does not belong to the people, it belongs to the government,” O’Leary said.
The Broadcast Freedom Act, which would have forbidden the FCC from establishing a fairness doctrine, was blocked in 2007.
In 2009, it was added to the bill to give the District of Columbia a representative in Congress.
“The press that uses air and electrons, should be and must be as free from government control as the press that uses paper and ink,” former FCC Chairman Mark Fowler said in a February interview with radio talk-show host Mark Levin.
The internet and talk radio are in danger of increased government regulation, a national pollster and former radio host said yesterday at a forum held by the conservative Heritage Foundation.
Bestselling author Brad O’Leary said Americans should be wary of radio and internet regulations because they tend to disadvantage the conservative media.
“Bills being introduced into Congress will bring a fairness doctrine to the internet,” he said.
Repealed during the Reagan Administration, the fairness doctrine was a Federal Communications Commission policy that required broadcasters to present both sides of every issue.
O’Leary said that talk radio and the internet are the only way for conservatives to express themselves. Conservatives, O’Leary believes, would be unfairly disadvantaged by the re-implementation of the fairness doctrine.
“Newspapers and the news country are completely biased,” O’Leary said. “Obama could count on wonderful press and glowing stories during the election. He could not count on that with talk radio or the internet.”
But some Democrats in Congress want to re-regulate the airwaves.
“I think it’s absolutely time to pass a standard, whether its called the fairness doctrine or something else, but it’s time to be bringing accountability to the airwaves,” Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said in an February interview. “I have already had some discussions with colleagues.”
Other legislation being considered could force talk radio to feature more local coverage and diversify their ownership.
President Obama has said he does not support a renewal of the fairness doctrine, but he does support other measures to increase the number of viewpoints on the air.
“Obama supports media-ownership caps, network neutrality, public broadcasting, as well as increasing minority ownership of broadcasting and print outlets,” said Obama’s former campaign press secretary Michael Ortiz.
O’Leary said new regulation would violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment. He also said the FCC might not renew the licenses of broadcasts that were considered not diverse enough.
“They believe talk radio does not belong to the people, it belongs to the government,” O’Leary said.
The Broadcast Freedom Act, which would have forbidden the FCC from establishing a fairness doctrine, was blocked in 2007.
In 2009, it was added to the bill to give the District of Columbia a representative in Congress.
“The press that uses air and electrons, should be and must be as free from government control as the press that uses paper and ink,” former FCC Chairman Mark Fowler said in a February interview with radio talk-show host Mark Levin.
Related Articles
- ABC News Tries To Frame Obama As The Next Reagan
- UPDATE: The Health Care Debate, 6/23/09
- Senate Democrats Soft on Terrorism
- There Can Be No Debate: Epic Stimulus Waste
- Health Care Plans Fuel Abortion Debate
June 26th, 2009 at 8:29 am
Excellent alert! We must defend our 1st Amendment rights
[Reply to this Comment]
June 26th, 2009 at 4:33 pm
The “Fairness Doctrine” is a misnomer. These regulations would be in direct defiance of the 1st Amendment. However, the Obama Administration seems to have little reverence for the constitution so I would not be surprised if they eventually pursued this. Liberals already have most of the media market cornered, they simply want to shut down the last bastion of conservatism in the media – talk radio. Keep talking Rush!
[Reply to this Comment]
June 26th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Why can’t the “Demoncrats” leave us alone and respect our constitution!
[Reply to this Comment]
June 26th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
It’s important to keep the “airwaves” free from restriction. Violating network neutrality is a slippery slope.
[Reply to this Comment]
June 29th, 2009 at 4:29 pm
More Socialist government control.
The Democrats who are pushing this are obviously feeling terribly threatened by the overwhelming popularity of right leaning blogs, Rush, and Fox News. These news sources are so popular because they point out what the others don’t: the truth. The truth is very scary to politicians who count on an ignorant voter base.
[Reply to this Comment]
July 25th, 2009 at 12:30 pm
I have no problem with “Fairness Doctrine” as long as applied to every media.
See how this will work out.
[Reply to this Comment]